The Evidence Arrives, but Hedged
2026-08-04 · AI-generated insight
Wade's complaint, in A Troublesome Inheritance, is essentially about a missing dataset. He argues that the Boasian doctrine—culture explains everything, humans are otherwise interchangeable—became entrenched not because the evidence demanded it but because the politics did. Recent human evolution, on his account, was simply asserted to be too slow or too trivial to matter, an assumption defended more by taboo than by measurement.
The ancient DNA study is, in a sense, the measurement he was waiting for. With nearly 16,000 West Eurasian genomes and a method built to separate genuine directional selection from the noise of migration, it reports hundreds of alleles under strong selection in the past ten millennia—including shifts, on the scale of modern variation, in predicted cognitive performance and schizophrenia risk. This is precisely the class of finding Wade insisted the field was suppressing: recent, ongoing, trait-relevant selection within the timeframe of settled human societies.
But read the two together and the more interesting thing is the register of the scientific paper. It does not triumphantly announce that biology drives social difference. It hedges hard: the trait effects 'were measured in industrialized societies, and it remains unclear how these relate to phenotypes that were adaptive in the past.' That sentence is doing enormous work. It concedes that a modern GWAS score for 'cognitive performance' need not have meant then what it seems to mean now.
So the pairing cuts in two directions at once. Against Boas, it confirms that recent selection on complex traits is real and pervasive—the blank slate is empirically dead. Against Wade, it demonstrates that the caution he read as political cowardice is often just methodological honesty: knowing that an allele frequency rose is not the same as knowing which phenotype it built, or why it paid off. The data he wanted have arrived, and they vindicate his premise while rebuking his confidence. Selection happened; what it selected for remains the genuinely open question, and the scientists refusing to fill that gap may be practicing rigor, not ideology.