Equality [of the races] is not given a priori. It is neither an ethical principle (though equal treatment may be) nor a statement about norms of social action. It just worked out that way. A hundred different and plausible scenarios for human history would have yielded other results (and moral dilemmas of enormous magnitude). They didn't happen.
Filed under
Topics
Pollinations citing this note
- A Wager on a Contingent Fact 2026-09-14
- Moral Equality Held Hostage to Empirical Sameness 2026-09-13
- Equality as a Hostage to Fortune 2026-09-05
- Equality Held Hostage to Data 2026-09-03
- Equality as an Empirical Accident — and Why That's Both Powerful and Precarious 2026-08-29
- When a Contingent Fact Gets Defended Like a Moral Axiom 2026-08-28
- When Morality Is Held Hostage to Facts, the Facts Get Policed 2026-08-19
- Betting Morality on Data Corrupts the Data 2026-08-12
- Hitching Morality to a Contingent Fact 2026-08-12
- Anti-Racism Held Hostage to Evidence 2026-08-10
- Mortgaging Ethics to Empirical Claims 2026-08-09
- If Equality Is Contingent, It Cannot Be Defended by Decree 2026-08-03
- Equality Held Hostage: When a Moral Commitment Rests on an Empirical Accident 2026-07-29
- Lewontin Builds the House Gould Told Him Not To 2026-07-29
- Gould's Concession Is the Door Warne Walks Through 2026-07-26
- Gould Concedes the Ground the Coon Affair Shows Nobody Will Examine 2026-07-25
- The Same Cause Can Be Defended Honestly or Enforced Blindly 2026-07-24
- If Racial Equality Is Contingent, Then Process Is Everything 2026-07-23
- The Danger of Making Equality an Empirical Claim 2026-07-20
- The Manufactured Consensus and the Contingent Fact 2026-07-20
- Gould's Contingency Argument Quietly Concedes Warne's Ground 2026-07-20